Shifting the Overton Window
Treat radical ideas as strategic tools: they move what counts as realistic before laws ever change.
Big social shifts often start with ideas that sound unrealistic. The extension points to opinion research showing that people do not update beliefs in neat, gradual steps; change often requires direct friction with uncomfortable facts and visible dissent.
A single person refusing false consensus can materially increase truth-telling by others.
Keep building castles in the sky - political reality often catches up later.
James Kuklinski's findings challenge the fantasy that reasoned debate alone changes minds; disagreement pressure can matter more.
Asch-style conformity studies show group pressure is powerful, but also that one dissenting voice can break consensus effects.
Ambitious proposals expand the policy imagination and can become tomorrow's practical baseline.